The Ten Thousand Distance Short 3" is an ultralight perforated running short with a brief liner, a zippered rear phone pocket and internal gel pockets. It lists at about $128, one of the highest prices among running shorts we looked at. Ten Thousand built it for long runs, tempo days and races. It is a specialist piece for serious runners, not an everyday gym short, and the 3 inch cut will not suit everyone.
Illustration drawn from the product’s specs — see the brand’s site for real photos and colors.
Ten Thousand Distance Short 3" Review (2026)
our rating
Best for: Serious runners who carry gels and a phone.
Skip it if: You want longer coverage or run on a budget.
We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you. Brands can’t pay for placement, and it never changes our picks. How we make money.
What we like
- Ultralight perforated shell
- Zippered rear phone pocket plus gel and key pockets
- Integrated brief liner
- Elasticated shirt loop
- Built for long runs, tempo days and races
Watch out for
- $128 is among the most expensive running shorts
- 3 inch inseam is a lot of leg
- Only black seen
On this page
Fit and sizing
The Distance comes in sizes XS to XXL and, when we checked, in one color, black. It has a 3 inch inseam, which is a short cut that gives plenty of leg freedom but little coverage. The fit is slim, with a no-bunch waistband and internal drawcord. Our shorts finder can help you decide if 3 inches is right for you.
Fabric and feel
The shell is 80% polyester and 20% spandex at 125 GSM. The liner is 82% nylon and 18% spandex. Ten Thousand calls the shell ultra-light, perforated, breathable and quick-drying, and lists "recycled materials" among the features without giving percentages. It adds a permanent Odorblock treatment.
How it performs for running
Storage is the reason to pay up: a zippered rear phone pocket, internal waistband gel pockets, an internal key pocket and an elasticated shirt loop. The integrated brief liner is described as chafe-free and hotspot-free. Because it is a race-oriented cut, expect little fabric and lots of airflow. See our best running shorts for men for more options.
Price and value
At about $128 this is a luxury-priced running short. The Lululemon Pace Breaker lists around $68 with zip and phone storage but no liner, and the Gymshark Running 5" is about $48 with a liner. You pay for refinement and gel storage.
Alternatives
For a more versatile Ten Thousand short, try the Session 5" at about $98 lined. The Under Armour Launch Elite 7" offers a mesh liner and rear pocket at about $50.
Who should skip it
Skip it if you do not run long distances, want more coverage than 3 inches, or have a tight budget.
Specs
| For | Men |
|---|---|
| Sizes | XS–XXL |
| Extended fits | Plus sizes |
| Fabric | Shell: 80% polyester, 20% spandex (125 GSM); liner: 82% nylon, 18% spandex (102 GSM) |
| Recycled materials | Yes (brand states) |
| Inseam options | 3″ |
| Liner | Brief |
| Pockets | Multi |
| Fit | Slim |
| Fabric feel | Woven light |
| Waistband | Drawcord |
| Colors | 1 at time of checking |
| Good for | Running, Long runs, Speed work, Racing |
The verdict
A premium, minimalist long-run short with excellent storage. It is only worth about $128 if you carry gels and a phone on long runs and want a 3 inch cut. For everyone else, far cheaper shorts cover the basics well enough.
Alternatives to consider
Frequently asked questions
How much is the Ten Thousand Distance short?
About $128 on Ten Thousand's page when we checked.
Does it have a liner?
Yes. It has an integrated brief liner, 82% nylon and 18% spandex.
Does it have a phone pocket?
Yes. Ten Thousand lists a zippered rear phone pocket, plus internal gel and key pockets.
What is the inseam?
3 inches, per the product name and Ten Thousand's page.
Sources and last checked · Oct 7, 2026
Notes: Feature list lists 'Recycled materials' without percentages; recycled flag set true on that basis. Only Black variant found. Ratings estimated.
Specs and prices come from the sources above and change often; ratings are our editorial estimates, not lab tests. Spot something out of date? Tell us.